Two Remembrances, Two Rejoicings — Jñāna-dṛṣṭi and Viśvarūpa-dṛṣṭi
A continuation of Part 1 (Bhagavad Gītā 18.72–73)
From Arjuna’s Clarity to Sañjaya’s Rejoicing
In Part 1, Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa’s enquiry in 18.72 and Arjuna’s response in 18.73 brought the
teaching to its decisive recognition: naṣṭo mohaḥ, smṛtir labdhā, gata-sandehaḥ, sthito’smi —
through Bhagavān’s grace, delusion has ended, understanding has been recovered, doubt has
been resolved, and firmness has been gained. The present enquiry turns to Sañjaya, who has heard this sacred dialogue and witnessed Bhagavān’s wondrous form. His repeated
remembrance reveals two complementary contemplative standpoints, culminating in the non-dual truth of Brahman.
Series: The Gītā’s Final Word | Part 2 of 3 | Reference: Bhagavad Gītā 18.76–77
After Arjuna declares in 18.73 that his delusion has been destroyed, Sañjaya describes his own response to what he has been privileged to hear and see.
Twice he says:
saṁsmṛtya saṁsmṛtya — remembering again and again.
But what he remembers in the two verses is different.
In 18.76, he remembers the saṁvāda — the teaching.
In 18.77, he remembers the rūpa — Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa’s wondrous universal form.
And both recollections culminate in:
hṛṣyāmi ca muhur muhuḥ — I rejoice again and again.
A textual refinement is important. Verse 18.76 explicitly remembers the dialogue or teaching,
whereas 18.77 explicitly remembers the viśvarūpa. The contemplative formulations “ātmanaḥ anyat kiñcid api nāsti” and “īśvarāt anyat kiñcid api nāsti” are Vedāntic reflections drawn from these two contexts; they should not be presented as literal glosses of Śrī Śaṅkarācārya’s Bhāṣya.
18.76 — Remembering the Teaching
राजन् संस्मृत्य संस्मृत्य संवादमिममद्भुतम् ।
केशवार्जुनयोः पुण्यं हृष्यामि च मुहुर्मुहुः ॥ १८.७६ ॥
rājan saṁsmṛtya saṁsmṛtya saṁvādam imam adbhutam |
keśavārjunayoḥ puṇyaṁ hṛṣyāmi ca muhur muhuḥ || 18.76 ||
| Pada | Artha (Meaning) |
|---|---|
| rājan | O King |
| saṁsmṛtya saṁsmṛtya | Remembering again and again |
| saṁvādam | The dialogue |
| imam | This |
| adbhutam | Wonderful, extraordinary |
| keśava-arjunayoḥ | Between Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna |
| puṇyam | Sacred, purifying |
| hṛṣyāmi | I rejoice, am thrilled |
| ca | And |
| muhur muhuḥ | Again and again |
What is Sañjaya remembering?
Not merely a fascinating conversation.
He has heard the dialogue through which the fundamental human error has been exposed and corrected.
The Gītā is:
śoka-moha → vicāra → tattva-jñānam.
Arjuna begins overwhelmed by sorrow and delusion. Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa unfolds karma-yoga,
upāsanā and ultimately the knowledge of the Self.
The culmination has just been declared:
naṣṭo mohaḥ — delusion is destroyed.
smṛtir labdhā — right understanding has been recovered.
gata-sandehaḥ — doubt has ended.
sthito’smi — I stand firm.
Sañjaya has witnessed the śāstra-pramāṇa accomplish its purpose.
No wonder he says: saṁsmṛtya saṁsmṛtya… hṛṣyāmi muhur muhuḥ.
The teaching itself becomes an object of repeated contemplation and joy.
A Vedāntic Contemplation upon 18.76
What is the essential vision unfolded by Brahma-vidyā?
The apparent individual, world and Īśvara do not establish a second independent reality apart from Brahman.
Therefore the contemplative assimilation may be expressed:
त्मनः अन्यत् किञ्चिदपि नास्ति ।
ātmanaḥ anyat kiñcid api nāsti.
There is nothing whatsoever apart from Ātmā.
This is not the destruction of the experienced world.
Nor does the jñānī need to close the physical eyes.
The negation is ontological, not perceptual.
Names and forms continue to appear; what is negated is their claim to independent reality apart from Brahman.
The ornament need not disappear for gold alone to be understood as its reality.
Likewise:
jīva is not other than Brahman.
jagat is not other than Brahman.
Īśvara, in the ultimate lakṣyārtha, is not other than Brahman.
Therefore, figuratively: “I close my eyes: ātmanaḥ anyat kiñcid api nāsti.”
The mind rests in the knowledge: aham brahmāsmi.
And remembering this teaching: hṛṣyāmi muhur muhuḥ — I rejoice again and again.
18.77 — Remembering the Viśvarūpa
तच्च संस्मृत्य संस्मृत्य रूपमत्यद्भुतं हरेः ।
विस्मयो मे महान् राजन् हृष्यामि च पुनः पुनः ॥ १८.७७ ॥
tac ca saṁsmṛtya saṁsmṛtya rūpam atyadbhutaṁ hareḥ |
vismayo me mahān rājan hṛṣyāmi ca punaḥ punaḥ || 18.77 ||
| Pada | Artha (Meaning) |
|---|---|
| tat ca | And that |
| saṁsmṛtya saṁsmṛtya | Remembering again and again |
| rūpam | Form |
| atyadbhutam | Exceedingly wondrous |
| hareḥ | Of Hari, Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa |
| vismayaḥ | Wonder, astonishment |
| me | For me |
| mahān | Great |
| rājan | O King |
| hṛṣyāmi | I rejoice |
| ca | And |
| punaḥ punaḥ | Again and again |
Notice the beautiful distinction.
18.76: saṁvādam saṁsmṛtya — remembering the teaching.
18.77: rūpam saṁsmṛtya — remembering the universal form.
The first naturally lends itself to jñāna-dṛṣṭi.
The second naturally lends itself to Īśvara-dṛṣṭi.
What is the Vision of Viśvarūpa?
The viśvarūpa is not merely a gigantic divine form appearing somewhere within the universe.
Its profound teaching value is: The universe itself is the manifestation of Īśvara.
Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa has already unfolded Himself as the source, sustenance and resolution of
the universe.
Vedānta speaks of Īśvara as: abhinna-nimitta-upādāna-kāraṇam —
the intelligent and material cause of the universe, non-separate from the effect.
If the material cause is Īśvara, where can one find something outside Īśvara?
The wave cannot step outside water.
The ornament cannot step outside gold.
The pot cannot step outside clay.
Likewise, the jagat cannot stand independently outside its cause.
Therefore the contemplative vision becomes:
ईश्वरात् अन्यत् किञ्चिदपि नास्ति ।
īśvarāt anyat kiñcid api nāsti.
There is nothing whatsoever apart from Īśvara.
The Prepared Bhakta’s Open-Eyed Vision
This is where karma-yoga and upāsanā acquire extraordinary significance.
Karma-yoga → citta-śuddhi.
Upāsanā → citta-ekāgratā.
Upon such preparation, the understanding of Īśvara as abhinna-nimitta-upādāna-kāraṇa
transforms one’s relationship with the world.
Previously: jagat = objects available for rāga and dveṣa.
Now: jagat = Īśvara’s manifestation.
The same world remains.
The dṛṣṭi changes.
The sun is Īśvara.
The earth is Īśvara.
The body is Īśvara.
The senses are Īśvara.
The other person is within Īśvara.
Every law sustaining the universe is Īśvara.
There is nowhere outside the order of Īśvara from which the individual can stand apart and
confront Him.
Hence: īśvarāt anyat kiñcid api nāsti.
This is the extraordinary devotional value of viśvarūpa-darśanam.
“I Close My Eyes; I Open My Eyes”
We can now bring the two verses into one contemplative vision.
When the attention resolves from nāma-rūpa:
ātmanaḥ anyat kiñcid api nāsti.
There is nothing apart from Ātmā.
This is the direction of Brahma-vidyā.
When the eyes open upon nāma-rūpa:
īśvarāt anyat kiñcid api nāsti.
There is nothing in the manifest universe apart from Īśvara.
This is viśvarūpa-dṛṣṭi.
Thus, poetically:
Eyes closed — Ātmā alone.
Eyes open — Īśvara everywhere.
But Advaita takes us one decisive step further.
These cannot finally remain two visions of two realities.
From Īśvara-dṛṣṭi to Brahma-dṛṣṭi
If the open-eyed vision is: sarvam Īśvaraḥ — all this is Īśvara,
and the teaching reveals: Ātmā is Brahman,
then the culmination is not: Ātmā here; Īśvara there.
The very truth of jīva, jagat and Īśvara is one non-dual Brahman.
We can therefore see a beautiful progression:
jagat-dṛṣṭi
“I see an independently existing world.”
↓
Īśvara-dṛṣṭi
“I see the world as non-separate from its cause, Īśvara.”
↓
Brahma-dṛṣṭi
“Neither cause nor effect establishes a second reality apart from Brahman.”
This is where the two remembrances finally meet.
Dṛśyam and Brahman — One Important Refinement
The expression “When the dṛśyam ends, it is Brahman” is evocative, but Vedāntically it can
be sharpened.
Brahman does not become available only when dṛśyam disappears.
Even while dṛśyam is present:
Brahman alone is its satyam.
Therefore:
dṛśyam asti → Brahman alone is its reality.
dṛśyam nāsti → Brahman remains self-evident.
The presence of an appearance does not compromise Advaita.
Just as the presence of ornaments does not compromise the fact:
sarvam suvarṇam — all is gold.
Thus one need not wait for the world to disappear in order to discover Brahman.
This is the magnificence of the teaching.
Why Does Sañjaya Rejoice Again and Again?
Now saṁsmṛtya saṁsmṛtya becomes extraordinarily meaningful.
In 18.76:
He remembers the saṁvāda.
The teaching that removes ignorance.
ātmanaḥ anyat kiñcid api nāsti.
And:
hṛṣyāmi muhur muhuḥ.
In 18.77:
He remembers the viśvarūpa.
The universe as the manifestation of Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa.
īśvarāt anyat kiñcid api nāsti.
And:
hṛṣyāmi punaḥ punaḥ.
Two Remembrances — One Culmination
| 18.76 | 18.77 |
|---|---|
| saṁvādam | rūpam |
| The sacred dialogue | The wondrous universal form |
| Brahma-vidyā | Viśvarūpa-darśanam |
| Jñāna-dṛṣṭi | Īśvara-dṛṣṭi |
| ātmanaḥ anyat kiñcid api nāsti | īśvarāt anyat kiñcid api nāsti |
| Rejoices muhur muhuḥ | Rejoices punaḥ punaḥ |
And Advaita resolves even this apparent duality:
Ātmā is not other than Brahman.
Īśvara’s essential reality is not other than Brahman.
Jagat has no independent existence apart from Brahman.
Therefore the culmination is not merely: “When I close my eyes, Brahman.”
Nor merely: “When I open my eyes, Īśvara.”
It matures into: Whether the eyes are open or closed, there is no second reality.
The difference lies only in the standpoint.
With nāma-rūpa manifest: Īśvara-dṛṣṭi.
In the knowledge of their essential reality: Brahma-dṛṣṭi.
The Vicāra Essence
Sañjaya has witnessed something exceedingly rare.
He has heard Brahma-vidyā directly from Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa.
He has witnessed the viśvarūpa granted to Arjuna.
So he remembers the teaching—
saṁsmṛtya saṁsmṛtya.
And rejoices.
He remembers the universal form—
saṁsmṛtya saṁsmṛtya.
And rejoices.
For the sādhaka these two verses can therefore become a profound contemplation:
Withdraw attention from nāma-rūpa and enquire into their satyam: ātmanaḥ anyat kiñcid api nāsti.
Look upon the manifest universe with Īśvara-dṛṣṭi: īśvarāt anyat kiñcid api nāsti.
Then enquire into the truth of both Ātmā and Īśvara: Brahman alone is satyam.
Then there is no need to reject the world to discover Brahman.
There is no need to hold the world in order to appreciate Īśvara.
The eyes may close.
The eyes may open.
The vision of knowledge remains:
न द्वितीयं किञ्चिदस्ति ।
na dvitīyaṁ kiñcid asti.
There is no second reality whatsoever.
And then perhaps Sañjaya’s words become completely understandable:
हृष्यामि च मुहुर्मुहुः ।
hṛṣyāmi ca muhur muhuḥ.
I rejoice again and again.
हृष्यामि च पुनः पुनः ॥
hṛṣyāmi ca punaḥ punaḥ.
I rejoice, again and again.
Sadā Śrī Śaṅkara Smaraṇam
Madhavan Shankaranarayanan














